Free PDF Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin

Free PDF Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin

Reviewing will not make you constantly imaging and also dreaming concerning something. It should be the manner that will certainly buy you to really feel so sensible and wise to undergo this life. Even analysis might be dull, it will certainly rely on guide kind. You could choose Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin that will certainly not make you really feel bored. Yeah, this is not kin of enjoyable publication or spoof publication. This is a book in which each word will certainly offer you deep definition, however simple and also basic uttered.

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin

Free PDF Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin

This is your absolutely time to find over and have particular behavior. Checking out as one the pastime to do can be done as practice. Also you might not have the ability to review on a daily basis, you alternative to select reviewing a book to go along with in leisure is right sufficient. There are not all people have by doing this. Several also believe that analysis will certainly be so uninteresting.

Do you ever before recognize the book Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin Yeah, this is an extremely intriguing e-book to check out. As we told previously, reading is not kind of obligation activity to do when we have to obligate. Reviewing must be a practice, a great routine. By reading Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin, you could open the new world and also obtain the power from the globe. Everything could be gained through guide Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin Well in quick, publication is quite effective. As what we provide you right below, this Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin is as one of reviewing book for you.

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin as one of the referred publications that we will supply in this internet site has been taken a look at to be one valid source. Even this topic is common, the means just how writer makes it is extremely attractive. It can bring in individuals that have not feels for reviewing to begin reading. It will make someone keen on this book to read. And also it will certainly show a person to earn far better choice.

read. Why? Once again, this is so appropriate with the subject that you actually require currently. It will additionally make your choice of the day to fill up the time by reading this book. Also it is a sort of soft documents forms, Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis Of Scientific Naturalism And Christian Faith, By David Ray Griffin web content will not be various with the print from the book.

Review

"A concise and lucid summary of Griffin's influential theological synthesis. Those interested would do well to start with this work." -- John F. Haught, Thomas Healey Professor of Theology, Georgetown University, and author of Deeper Than Darwin"A magisterial theological work. With stunning force, Griffin reconstructs such key doctrines as divine power, creation, love, trinity, and resurrection." -- Catherine Keller, Professor of Theology, Drew University, and author of Face of the Deep"A rewarding overview. With characteristic sureness of hand, Griffin outlines a process theology that embraces both naturalism and Christianity." -- Philip Clayton, Ingraham Professor of Theology, Claremont School of Theology, and author of God and Contemporary Science"A superb work of religious scholarship. David Griffin has achieved a fusion that is both lucid and engaging." --Charles Birch, Emeritus Professor of Biology, University of Sydney, and winner of the 1990 Templeton Prize

Read more

About the Author

David Ray Griffin is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy and Theology at Claremont School of Theology, Professor Emeritus of Religion at Claremont Graduate University, and Co-Founder of the Center for Process Studies. He is the author of Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, and coauthor, with John B. Cobb Jr., of Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Author of numerous books in philosophy of religion, he has also published two popular books on the World Trade Center attacks: The New Pearl Harbor: Distubing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions.

Read more

Product details

Paperback: 152 pages

Publisher: Westminster John Knox Press (May 28, 2004)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0664227732

ISBN-13: 978-0664227739

Product Dimensions:

5.5 x 0.4 x 8.5 inches

Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review:

3.9 out of 5 stars

6 customer reviews

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

#515,127 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

I actually bought this book for Howard Van Til's very substantial foreword. I wanted to know where Van Til stood, theologically, since his departure from Calvin College, and since being so strongly rejected by many conservative evangelicals because of his belief in theistic evolution.Reading Griffin was an eye-opener (as it was for Van Til, when he first encountered Griffin's criticisms of his position). Even though this is meant to be introductory, it is dry in terms of style, by dynamite in terms of content. Griffin offers a critique of naturalism. But wait. Although Christians loosely critique something they call "naturalism," and while more sophisticated thinkers might go so far as to distinguish between "methodological naturalism" and "metaphysical naturalism," Griffin shows those are too imprecise, and more than a little shallow. He really digs into what philosophers have thought about naturalism, and what assumptions they got wrong. It led me to Griffin's much larger works, Reenchantment without Supernaturalism, which I would highly recommend.

a little boring at times but overall, a clear and concise explanation of how science can relate to religious faith in a complementary way.

Retired theologian David Ray Griffin (b. 1939) has written/cowritten other books such as Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition,Primordial Truth and Postmodern Theology,Reenchantment without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion,God and Religion in the Postmodern World: Essays in Postmodern Theology,Varieties of Postmodern Theology, etc. [He has more recently become well-known for his skeptical views on 9/11: e.g., Debunking 9/11 Debunking.]He wrote in the Preface to this 2004 book, “In the generic or minimal sense, scientific naturalism is simply the denial of supernatural interruptions of the world’s basic causal processes. Naturalism in this sense is not a new idea… Scientific naturalism in this sense does, to be sure, conflict with many forms of Christian faith that have appeared through the centuries, but it is not obvious that it conflicts with Christian faith itself or even rules out a robust version of Christian faith. I argue that it does not. Indeed, I suggest that scientific naturalism in the generic sense is a great truth that should be enthusiastically adopted by Christians… My perspective suggests that there has been about the same amount of error on both sides of the debate but that there is also a very great truth being defended by each side… By sorting out the truth from the error on both sides, we can develop a worldview that can be held in common.” (Pg. xxi-xxii)He argues, “There are a number of our hard-core commonsense beliefs to which modern scientific naturalism cannot do justice. One of these is our belief that we have experience… materialist philosophers have been unable to explain how experience could have emerged out of the insentient (nonexperiencing) matter that they believe… to constitute the bottom layer of nature… Materialists still face the problem of how a brain consisting of nonexperiencing neurons could produce conscious experience… The other side of the mind-body problem is how our conscious experience can affect the brain and thereby bring about bodily behaviors.” (Pg. 23)He observes, “having distinguished between doctrines that are true only mythologically and those that are simply false, I now add that there are some doctrines that arguably could be classified either way. The idea of Jesus as ‘the son of God’ provides an example. On the one hand, the idea that Jesus was in some sense simply God---in particular, that Jesus was the incarnation of the second person of the Divine Trinity in such a way that Jesus shared in the divine omniscience---should be discarded as simply false… On the other hand, one could claim that this gives poetic or mythological expression to a deep truth about Jesus, which is that God was present in him and acted through him in an extraordinary way. I myself accept this idea, partly because in my view … God does… influence us by, in one sense, entering into us… If the idea that a woman could give birth to God is not to be put in the category of the simply false, what should be?” (Pg. 35-36)He asserts that Free Will Theism “provides no answer to the problem of what is usually called ‘natural evil,’ meaning the forms of evil that are not due to human volition, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, floods, and disease… A second problem with traditional free will theism is that according to its hypothesis, God could intervene to prevent any specific instance of evil. God could have diverted every bullet headed toward a human being ‘too young to die.’ God could have prevented any of the massacres that have occurred. God could, in fact, prevent any sinful human intention from producing its intended effects. And God could prevent any disease or any natural disaster from producing permanent injury, agonizing suffering, or premature death.” (Pg. 54-55)He says of the concept of life after death, “I have recently examined various kinds of evidence… and concluded that it is persuasive. For Christians, therefore, the evidence provided by Jesus’ resurrection can be supplemented by more recent evidence, some of which has been rigorously investigated and documented by parapsychologists and physicians… although the evidence for life after death is strong, a change from naturalism to the kind of naturalism suggested by [Alfred North] Whitehead is important if the belief in life after death is again to become a respectable belief in intellectual circles. The empirical evidence can be convincing only if people will study it, and thus far more intellectuals have been unwilling to do so… But insofar as people see the superiority of Whitehead’s form of naturalism, with its nondualistic interactionism and its prehensive doctrine of perception, these a priori objections are overcome, so that the evidence can be taken seriously.” (Pg. 82)He says of ‘Panentheism and the problem of evil,’ “in creating our world, God evoked a contingent form of order out of a situation that already embodied certain principles of order---principles that are not contingent but necessary, lying in the very nature of things. We have looked at the most basic of these principles: that in addition to God there is always a multiplicity of finite actual occasions embodying creativity, with creativity involving the twofold power of self-determination and efficient causation on future events. Another necessary principle is that this twofold power of the finite actual occasions cannot be overridden by divine power. The ‘cannot’ here is not merely a MORAL ‘cannot’… but a METAPHYSICAL ‘cannot.’ The idea that there are certain things that God cannot do is, of course, not a new idea… Free will theists … [say] that God cannot wholly determine the actions of creatures with freedom because that would be self-contradictory. Whitehead… added the further point that, because ALL individuals necessarily have at least an iota of freedom and this freedom is inherent in the nature of the world, God cannot fully determine the activities of ANY creatures.” (Pg. 88)He continues, “The uniquely human capacity for evil has led many antitheistic philosophers to ask their theistic friends, ‘Why didn’t God create rational saints?’ by which they mean beings who are like us in most respects… but guaranteed not to sin. The Whiteheadean answer to this question is obvious: God could not have created such beings, because God could guarantee that creatures otherwise like us would not sin only by creating them devoid of freedom, and that was impossible… According to process theism… To bring about creatures who can enjoy the values we do was necessarily to bring about creatures as dangerous as we are… Given this perspective, we can criticize God for the world’s evil only if we can honestly say that human evil is so bad that the world would have been better off without human beings… process theists say that … the possibility of such evils could have been prevented only in a world devoid of human-like beings… Even God cannot have the good without the risk of evil.” (Pg. 91-92)He points out, “The question before us now, I suggest, is whether we can, without returning to supernaturalistic interpretations of Christian faith, with their arrogance, move beyond this timidity to respectful confidence. That is, can we recover confidence in the universal truth and importance of the primary doctrines of Christian faith while, at the same time, accepting the great truth of scientific naturalism and manifesting respect for the other great religious traditions? … can we develop a theology that, while being both naturalistic and pluralistic, is robustly Christian?” (Pg. 101)He suggests, “The next question is whether we can understand the incarnation of God in Jesus as having occurred through persuasion rather than as requiring a supernatural exception to God’s normal way of acting in the world… In process philosophy, this kind of incarnation could have resulted from Jesus’ experience of… God’ influence on him. Causation between two individuals … involves an internal relation, in which the cause enters, in a sense, into the effect… because God influences all events, God is present in all events… The only question is how God could have been present in such a way as to make Jesus a decisive revelation of God… God always presents initial aims toward the best possibilities open to the individual… the best possibilities for a human being differ radically… the aims for some individuals will reflect the general divine aim more directly than the aims for other individuals… a devout person such as Jesus, growing up in [the Jewish] tradition, would be well suited to receive divine aims highly reflective of the general aim of God for the world… we can understand Jesus as one in whom God was incarnate in such a way that it is appropriate for us to apprehend Jesus as a decisive revelation of God’s character, purpose, and mode of operation.” (Pg. 109-110)He concludes, “we can perhaps now, through a new form of naturalism combined with the empirical evidence provided by parapsychology, think of the end of our present life not as the end of our journey with God but simply as the beginning of its next phase. If so, we can conceive that divine grace, working entirely through the attractive power of love, might sanctify us all. There would be no need for the divine violence of casting sinners into hell. God would, instead, love the hell out of us.” (Pg.This book is an excellent exposition of Griffin’s theological views, and will be “must reading” for anyone seriously studying him, Process Theology, or other forms of liberal/progressive Christianity.

David Ray Griffin's book "Two Great Truths" is well-written and understandable for those who are not conversant in the academic discussions revolving around Process Theology. The book aims to be a new synthesis between scientific naturalism and Christian faith. The problem in my view is that Griffin's understanding of Christianity is so far afield as to make it scarcely Christian. Griffin strips away supernaturalism, the divinity of Christ, a traditional understanding of the Trinity, creation ex nihilo, belief in hell and many other truths which have been held by Christians down through the centuries. Griffin and others would argue that these truths were established at the Church Councils and are secondary beliefs but I take the view that these views were in the lifeblood of the earliest churches and were coming together in the centuries leading to the Councils. The Councils were a matter of affirmation, not creation, of doctrine.. Griffin's summary of the essentials of the Christian faith on pages 29-31 is so general that it is hardly Christian. There is nothing distinctively Christian about it. And this is where we part ways, for at the heart of the Christian faith must be the person of Jesus Christ. That He came to earth from God and lived without sin and died an atoning death and was raised from the dead and ascended to heaven and will return, these are fundamental truths, not secondary truths as Griffin asserts. To say and believe less than this is to be less than Christian. That these beliefs may raise difficult questions about the problem of evil or the connection of science to faith are the real secondary issues. The only thing that matters at the end of the day is whether Jesus was who He said He was and whether He did what He said He did. There are evidences to explore and reasons to believe. Whether one embraces faith in Jesus is not a matter of a blind leap but of an assured trust in the uniqueness and veracity of His life. With this settled in one's mind and heart, there are still questions to be addressed to be sure and some of them may indeed by exacerbated by faith in Christ as I have described it. Humility is a necessity not only on the front end of faith but on the back end. Our inability to make all the pieces fit at this time does not mean we should move in the direction of Griffin, jettisoning core truths about Jesus for the sake of a synthesis which so dilutes Christian faith as to make it unrecognizable.

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin PDF
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin EPub
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin Doc
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin iBooks
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin rtf
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin Mobipocket
Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin Kindle

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin PDF

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin PDF

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin PDF

Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, by David Ray Griffin PDF